TECHNET Archives

November 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:18:28 -0600
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Hi Julie - Yes, there is published data - look up Wally Bader's 
dissolution data in:

W. Bader, ?Dissolution of Au, Ag, Pd, Pt, Cu, and Ni in a Molten Tin-Lead 
Solder?, Welding Journal 48, 1969.

Also:

R.J. Klein Wassink,  Soldering in Electronics, ISBN 0-901150-14-2, Chapter 
4, page 114, element dissolution figure 4.19

Pt and Ni have about the same dissolution rates for eutectic tin/lead 
solder.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]



From:   Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   11/27/2012 07:04 PM
Subject:        Re: [TN] Termination finishes, Cu thickness under Ag, 
Au-Pt-Pd
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



The claim of the supplier is that the Pt prevents the Au from dissolving 
into the solder.  Hmmm.  Can anyone back that up? 
The recent info on this is that it's looking like a wettability problem 
more than a dissolving-into-the-joint problem, although neither is 
confirmed.



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2