TECHNET Archives

October 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:21:18 -0600
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Rob Strecker <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Rob Strecker <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Hi all,

I was wondering if I could get some feedback regarding washing of misprinted
PCBs.  What do you prefer, spray in air, ultrasonic immersion, other
methods?  I am thinking of moving to an ultrasonic immersion process but am
concerned about damaging components already populated on one side, due to
the ultrasonic frequency.  Is this a real concern if the frequency is 40kHz
and a power density of 7.6 watts/liter?

 

Also, what are the alternate methods used for cleaning a misprinted PCB, one
side populated post-reflow, with components that are not sealed for wash?

 

Thanks,

Rob Strecker



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2