TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
TechNet Mail Forum<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Moisture Sensative Components
From:
John Vivari <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 12:22:23 -0400
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
"TechNet Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
I may be reverting to an old thread but I am new to the list and have a
open issue.  My companyis trying to get a handle on what standard operating
practices are being used by other class 2 and 3 electronic manufacturers to
address the "Moisture Sentative Component" issue.   The IPC regulations
seem to imply a need for excessive amounts of record keeping.  What
experiece do other people on this list have?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2