Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:11:15 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1252" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bryon,
It probably varies considerably from company to company. Probably the best
approach is to understand what your customers / users expect, and how well
controlled your process are to meet their expectations. If you can produce a
product that meets expectations, you can safely skip inspection. You would
probably want to perform inspection a sample basis to verify that the process
hasn't changed.
Blair
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:06:00 -0400, Bryon Boone
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I understand the requirements within J-STD-001, in reference to COTS.
>
>Can some of you give me the industry consensus in reference to COTS
>inspection/ not to inspect?
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>
>Bryon
>
>
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|