Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tkdsY-00005gC; Thu, 8 Feb 96 15:27 CST |
Encoding: |
686 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 08 Feb 96 16:29:42 EST |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"KIRoZ3.0.vQC.Fhc6n"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Thu Feb 8 18: |
09:00 1996 |
Resent-From: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I recently read a small blurb saying that Aluminum Oxide crystals
will (after time and usage) have the corners rounded and will result
with a "peening" instead of a "toothed" scrub on copper layers. We
installed an Aluminum Oxide scrubber 6 mos ago and (to the best of my
knowledge) never encountered this. The system decants the small broken
up particles and we replenish based on usage. Initial tests proved
a more pronounced topology with better dryfilm adhesion.
I was just wondering if other people recently have ran into the
"peening" problem or was that just a skeleton from times past?
Groovy
|
|
|