TECHNET Archives

March 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Fri, 13 Mar 1998 17:02:31 EST
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, DDFRITZ <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Jacob,

I would say you have two alternatives

1. Go to some direct metallization system - they inherently do not contain
formaldehyde.

2. Continue to use the present system, but destruct the formaldehyde.  It
should react with excess caustic in the Cannizarro reaction that always occurs
to a small extent in an electroless system. Or, you could carbon treat the
waste stream which would remove all the organics.  The organics adsorbed would
be the formates from the electroless reaction and the formaldehyde from the
spent bath.  Then you would still have to deal with the regeneration of the
carbon black - or the disposal.

Denny Fritz

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2