TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0ugYwv-00009uC; Wed, 17 Jul 96 10:55 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 17 Jul 1996 11:57:54 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jul 19 16:
31:22 1996
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5237
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"67ui82.0.bU7.ypGxn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)

     
     Has anyone performed a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & 
     Threats) analysis on what it takes to make the transistion from an 
     in-house internal PCB Assembly process (mixed technology) vs. 
     utilizing contract PCB assembly vendors ? and would you be willing to 
     share this analysis. 
     
     Basically a good strawman of what are the key transistion factors 
     (business & technical considerations) is what we are after.
     
     Thanks,
     
     D.Drake

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2