TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uCi2j-000072C; Fri, 26 Apr 96 02:34 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
26 Apr 96 03:37:27 EDT
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3667
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 09:
40:06 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"2NS4q1.0.jR9.un7Wn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Paul R Waldner <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Phil,

I think that the realistic approach of allowing some breakout is the right way
to think. Many of our customers' customers here in Europe don't allow breakouts
of any kind. Perhaps a dose of functionality driven common-sense could be
applied here.  

I have been working for some time on laser drilling blind via applications where
the goal is .004" to .005" holes in pads of .010" to .012".  Breakout on pads
which are on internal layers and should be the foot of a laser drilled
interconnect can cause damage to the surrounding substrate.  This is one area
where breakout cannot be tolerated.

I hope that you are happy and well, Phil.  Take care--  Paul

Paul Waldner
Multiline International Europa
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2