TECHNET Archives

September 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:03:35 -0700
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<0F07EE77FE883741A9A0B3B7DCD9368202DD80E2@phoxcg01>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
John Foster <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I am curious about the 3.543 uin dielectric spacing recommendation in
6012C 3.6.2.15. I have to believe that this

Number did not just come out of thin air. I have been searching for any
long term reliability issues related to going below this number. I know
that HDI structures and embedded capacitors use very thin dielectrics
and the spec recommends low profile copper when going below this number.
We are doing Class 3 boards  and I am just trying to make sure I am not
shooting myself in the head going below this number. 

Thanks in advance


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2