TECHNET Archives

August 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
IPC TechNet Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Doug Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:44:18 +0100
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi Doug

I recall being asked the question regarding our (then) coatings and their ability to resist Skydrol.

When I enquired why, I was informed that the electronic circuits were in the cockpit, and they were worried about the effects on them if Skydrol were to “leak” onto them.

I had to ask why this would be important given that the pilot had already ejected to safety if that happened.

I don’t believe that anyone found a Skydrol resistant paint or coating but can’t Eastman help you?

ATB - Graham

> On 21 Aug 2017, at 22:06, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Good afternoon all,
> 
> Do any of you know a good epoxy-based paint that is resistant to Skydrol, a
> nasty phosphate based hydraulic fluid?
> 
> Doug Pauls
> Principal Materials and Process Engineer
> Rockwell Collins

ATOM RSS1 RSS2