TECHNET Archives

March 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0w39Fx-000BCbC; Fri, 7 Mar 97 17:40 CST
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BC2B16.C00CA3E0"
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Mar 1997 16:43:55 -0700
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Mon Mar 10 08:
31:23 1997
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/10957
TO:
"'technet'" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ChjXc2.0.VPB.8UA8p"@ipc>
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<[log in to unmask]>
From:
Dave Crowhurst <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.993.5
Subject:
Attaching methods for thermocouples
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (254 bytes) , application/ms-tnef (1396 bytes) 
Please reply offline.
We currently use an ceramic epoxy located 10 mm back from the 
thermocouple contact point to attach our thermocouples. I was 
wondering if anyone has come up with a more reliable method besides 
high temp solder.

Thank you in advance

Dave C

ATOM RSS1 RSS2