TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vjuQU-0000UFC; Mon, 13 Jan 97 16:00 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 13 Jan 97 13:26:00 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jan 13 16:
08:41 1997
Message-ID:
<Mon, 13 Jan 97 13:33:29 [log in to unmask]>
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9164
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"KKOMx2.0.cuH.j1hso"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Bilal Khalaf <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Dear Techies,

Is there a significant advantage in using ARCS instead of 45 degree 
angles when routing traces?
Advantages in inductance/resistance.... you know the usual.


Thanks in advance.

bilal

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2