Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vnQqz-0000akC; Thu, 23 Jan 97 09:14 CST |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
<bergda> |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:14:07 -0600 (CST) |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Thu Jan 23 14: |
32:41 1997 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"yE2fb1.0.YkK.21uvo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9701230901.E29874-0100000@ipc> |
cc: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dan, 2221/2 will supersede IPC-D-275 when published. 2221 is generic pwb
design and will support rigid/flex/mcml/pcmcia/discrete wire, etc. 2222
is rigid pwb sectional document.
Dave Bergman
On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, Dan Lorinser wrote:
> Sorry...One more question...WHAT THE HECK IS IPC-2221/2?
> Also, I talked to my PCB fabricator and they told me to STAY with 276
> untill THEY review/approve 6011/2 and use it.
> Dan Lorinser
> BFGoodrich Aerospace
>
>
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|