 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uiKL5-0000KeC; Mon, 22 Jul 96 07:43 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 22 Jul 96 08:51:37 EDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Apparently-To: |
|
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"649Yr2.0.Qc6.BUtyn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Jul 22 08: |
46:35 1996 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Methyl ethyl ketone is also one of the twenty or so organic chemicals
specifically limited by the toxicity characteristic under RCRA. The
limit under that test is 200 mg/L (ppm). You want to be careful that
you don't contaminate any of your non-hazardous waste with MEK, because
if it is tested and fails the TCLP test, your non-hazardous waste would
be considered hazardous. You might want to consider either segregating
the MEK waste or, better still, using another solvent.
thanks
john(:{)
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
