 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sbXeJ-0000GZC; Thu, 27 Jul 95 13:27 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!compuserve.com!100537.2615> |
| Date: |
27 Jul 95 13:30:38 EDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"rPZYC.0.w53.vfz5m"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
26:34 1996 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I found the responce to the problem of skips during coating very interesting but
please be very carfull that you do not move your skip problem to the assembly
company. The increase in mask thickness may seem a neat idear but it give us
using wave soldering a real problem not to mention our paste printing.
Bob Willis
SMART Group UK
|
|
|
