TECHNET Archives

August 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yu-Shan Han <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 11 Aug 1999 21:05:26 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1203 bytes) , text/html (3281 bytes)
Hi Ed,

I have plenty first-hand experience with all three types of foil.  My
opinion is that they all do equally well on fine line (5 mil line/spacing
and under) works.

Double treat material is primarily used by small, quick turn shops for
eliminating the preclean and oxide processes.  DSTF really has no advantage
over untreated copper if you don't give up preclean and still micro-etch in
the subsequent oxide process.  For fine line works, imaging is the most
important process.  Materials, treated or not, have little to do with what
graphics definition you put on them.  Once you weed out the exposure
problems and operator errors you will have reasonable yields.

Yu-Shan Han, Ph.D., P.E.
Lead One Technology, Inc.
Seattle, WA
(206) 368-8429

  -----Original Message-----
  From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Ed Cosper
  Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 1:55 PM
  To: [log in to unmask]
  Subject: [TN] Copper foil and fine line circuits


  Hi all,

  I am looking for feedback on the preferred foil treatment for use on .005"
lines/spaces innerlayers. Doubletreat, Reverse treat, no treat with oxide,
some other foil??????? All recommendations and reasons why would be
appreciated?

  Thanks for your help.

  Ed Cosper


ATOM RSS1 RSS2