TECHNET Archives

June 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:26:54 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (697 bytes) , text/html (954 bytes)
In a message dated 6/28/2001 3:20:58 PM Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> In addition, we all know that HASL is a nasty, dirty, filthy, rotton (fill
> in the descriptor of your choice) process and often leaves nasty, dirty
> filthy rotton residues behind.  It does nasty things to insulation
> resistance.  If you are going the no-clean route, HASL residues can kill
> your product and sometimes, users of your product.  By comparison, OSP is a
> much cleaner process and does not impact insulation resistance.
>

Amazing that any planes are still flying or equipment is still functioning
after all
these years of that "nasty" process that has provided adequate product.

Susan Mansilla


ATOM RSS1 RSS2