TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uR3fF-0000CeC; Tue, 4 Jun 96 16:29 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 04 Jun 96 16:32:16 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4535
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"wMTfG3.0._QH.mgAjn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Hollandsworth, Ron" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 17:
24:47 1996
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
     I have been investigating selective wave soldering.  Results 
     to date have been less than desirable.  The fixture is a 
     huge heat sink, non-metal.  The objective is to keep my SMD 
     away from the wave while soldering a few through hole parts 
     and eliminate my glue operation.  The first fixture I tried 
     held the CCA very high making it difficult to get successful 
     soldering.  Current machines are two super modified, nitro 
     burning Hollis GBS Marks that have been modified with a High 
     Mass Preheats, and modified Hot Air Knives with very flat 
     CFM response curves.  Also utilizing chip waves.  I would 
     appreciate any and all recommendations or experiences you 
     would be willing to share.  Thanks in advance.  Ron From 
     Hollis Land.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2