TECHNET Archives

July 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"TechNet (E-mail)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:12:51 -0700
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Ionograph reading for No clean v/s aqueous processed (water soluble flux)
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Does NO Clean processed parts show more ionic contamination than aqueous
processed parts when measured using ionograph? We are seeing third party
part showing 50 plus microgram of NaCl per square inch. Is there a different
ionograph measurement standard for No clean v/s aqueous washed (9.67
microgram of NaCl per square inch)? Is there an IPC/industry spec for No
clean processed parts?

Re,
Ken Patel

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2