TECHNET Archives

June 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:48:01 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Nigel Burtt <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
Nigel Burtt <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines)
Of course, hence "...suitably limited implementation..." in my post.

I'm thinking of assembly problems: printing, SPI, placement, reflow, AOI etc -  even if one could come up with a suitable mixed footprint stencil aperture, would the resulting solder joint meet IPC-A-610 visual inspection acceptability conditions for example.

Then there is the in-service-reliability aspect of the solder joints

ATOM RSS1 RSS2