Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tO5dI-0000MjC; Fri, 8 Dec 95 10:26 CST |
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!analog.com!Olly.Kierse> |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Dec 95 09:22:45 GMT |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Cc: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
27:00 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"qtcyf2.0.WPG.3T6om"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Two other advantages are:
- The filled vias provide very efficient heat sinking, particularly in the area
under the IC. I also saw a presentation recently by Amkor Anam, where they
showed data that adding a 4 x 4 matrix of balls under the IC, tied to the
die attach pad, gave a significant reduction in thermal resistance. Combine
this with your approach to lower the thermal resistance.
- Using vias as you suggest allows the repair of individual balls that may not
have reflowed properly, by touching up with a soldering iron and solder wire
from the bottom side.
Let us know how you get on.
Olly
|
|
|