Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:22:44 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<88F90E999CF1470DB8F44A7B5A6E54C6@bev1a0f3c0a9bc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John,
As others are stating there is no one "normal". Nortel (still waiting to see
if I get any of my pension), did 0 to 100C, 3000 cycles for long life
product.
Regards,
Bev
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 12:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Thermal Cycle Testing
Good morning !!
A question came up on reliability testing.
Typically PCBA's are thermally cycled as a part of reliability testing
usually for 1000 cycles.
What is the group's experience for non-military thermal cycling ranges?.
I am often asked to use 0 - 100c sometimes -40 to 85c and sometimes various
other thermal cycles picked from the JEDEC standard.
What is the groups experience for this?. I am trying to establish "normal"
practice.
Best regards,
John
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|