 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uyKoG-0000RIC; Wed, 4 Sep 96 11:28 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Sep 4 13: |
25:24 1996 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 1996 11:35:04 -0700 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7Bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-BeyondMail-Priority: |
1 |
| TO: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Cc: |
|
| X-Receipt-From-Agent: |
true |
| Conversation-Id: |
|
| X-MISTI-OPTIONS: |
EgnuMAb$tUrGrv58q[qxyW):qr.rSJNtM.x'-rSqr-DyqOT |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"I85Rr3.0.NoB.RuQBo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
BeyondMail for Windows/Professional 2.3 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am requesting information on methods of marking layers and panels for identification of Traceability, layer number, and side copper weight. We're looking for 'best practice' of layer marking. Concerns are to limit real estate and ensure proper side copper weight is identified.
Thank you for your inputs.
Regards,
Jim Reed, Texas Instruments, Austin, TX
Voice = 512 250-7172,
Fax = 512 250-7967,
Email = [log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
