 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tPcGY-0000MOC; Tue, 12 Dec 95 15:29 CST |
| Encoding: |
12 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!bldg4.plexus.plexus.com!RYerkes> |
| Date: |
Tue, 12 Dec 95 13:35:00 CST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
28:36 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"OYgLz.0.RFH._GVpm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Cc: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Looking for methods to identify missing components at the end of our
assembly operations. This would prevent the use of expensive test equipment
to find missing components.
Has anyone tried applying an ultraviolet die to the component locations on
the board? If the assembled board was passed under black light the marks
would indicate that a component was missing.
Thank you in advance,
Bob Yerkes
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
