TECHNET Archives

March 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:13:05 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (141 lines)
Bruce/Josep,

It as been a few years since the situation arose.  It was related to the
development of a new high temperature, power bybrid concept.  We found quite
vividly that 10 mil aluminum wires on copper in a non-oxidizing environment
(hermetic = nitrogen inside) degraded significantly after only a few hundred
hours of aging, whereas the 'control', baked in air, actually got better.  I
forget the actual mechanism, but the results made sense at the time.  I know
that on the surface, it does seem counter-intuitive, but that is the way it
worked out.

We ended up with the new packaging concept + plus conventional nickel & gold
flash platings, and all was (very) well.

That is about all I can say on the subject.


At 11:07 AM 3/5/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Josep,
>
>Steve does make a point.  I did not address heavy Al wire bonding since you
>did not make reference to it, however, I do not see what advantage oxygen
>and moisture in a non-nitrogen, non-hermetic environment would bring to the
>table as Steve suggests... perhaps he will enlighten us both.
>
>Regards,
>Bruce
>
>> ----------
>> From:        Creswick[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>> Reply To:    TechNet E-Mail Forum.;Creswick
>> Sent:        Monday, March 05, 2001 11:25 AM
>> To:  [log in to unmask]
>> Subject:     Re: [TN] Al wire bonding
>> 
>> Josep,
>> 
>> You did not define two critial parameters - wire size, and how many you
>> plan
>> to do!
>> 
>> I beg to differ with Bruce's response a bit.  
>> 
>> Fine wire aluminum wire on clean copper does work, although I much prefer
>> the nickel plating too!  
>> 
>> Fine wire aluminum (1.25 - 2 mil) IS challenging!  Normal Al wire doesn't
>> work very consistently - it is too soft.  One obtains too much bond
>> deformation before a 'real' bond is formed.  The trick is to use 'harder'
>> wire (lower elongation), but then the problem shifts to problems of
>> damaging
>> the IC's bond pads.  If you are not very experienced at wire bonding, this
>> could be daunting!
>> 
>> Specificially, heavy aluminum (5-10 mil diameter) works REALLY WELL on
>> copper - its only 'fault' is that it must be operated in an non-nitrogen
>> (ie. non-hermetic) environment to retain good pull strengths.  
>> 
>> Conclusions: If you have a couple parts to do, you might struggle though
>> as
>> suggested above.  If you have large numbers of parts to do, make it easier
>> on yourself (as Bruce suggests) and get them plated!  (But I suggest that
>> you test some sample plated parts before you plate up everything)
>> 
>> PS - In many respects, automatic wire bonding is still an 'art', although
>> science helps out at times.
>> 
>> And I can honestly say that the views expressed above are NOT those of my
>> employer.
>> 
>> 
>> Steven Creswick
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> At 01:41 PM 3/5/01 +0100, you wrote:
>> >I'm unable to make a wire ultrasonic bonding (wedge bond) with Al wire 
>> >directly to cupper pad.
>> >With your permission, I'd be interested to known if this bonding is
>> possible
>> >
>> >Thanks in advanced
>> >
>> >
>> >Josep M. Badia
>> >Servei de Recursos Tècnics
>> >Tèlf/Fax: 977 559630/559605
>> >Univ. Rovira i Virgili
>> >
>> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> ------
>> >Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
>> >To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>> >the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>> >To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
>> Technet NOMAIL
>> >Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases
>> >
>> E-mail Archives
>> >Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
>> additional
>> >information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
>> ext.5315
>> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> ------
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
>> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
>> Technet NOMAIL
>> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
>> E-mail Archives
>> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
>> additional
>> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
>> ext.5315
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> 
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2