TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!bailey.com!Gary.Thomas>
Date:
Wed, 6 Dec 95 10:20:12 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/357
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
25:56 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"MtVaB.0.c8E.yTYnm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Gary S Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tNTHq-0000MnC; Wed, 6 Dec 95 17:30 CST
X-Loop:
X-Priority:
3 (Normal)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
We have traditionally used 1/2 oz cu in our designs and are considering 1/4 
oz on some new designs (density issues).  Are any of you using 1/4 oz?  What 
min trace/clearance are you using.  In rework, do the pads lift off?  Any 
special concerns in manufacture??  Is cost greater/less than 1/2 oz?  Special 
handling problems? Etc etc etc???

Any input would be appreciated.

thanks

gary ...



ATOM RSS1 RSS2