 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 22 Nov 1996 09:48:24 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Nov 22 10: |
49:45 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
fee-rex @ connect.reach.net |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"1_a6S3.0.JR9.RiRbo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vQwlI-0000X2C; Fri, 22 Nov 96 08:39 CST |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am a recent inductee into our routing department, and
have been given the duty of
evaluating router bits, based on style and supplier. Can anybody suggest a
best method of
determining tool life cost, wear, etc.. based on experience or knowledge.
We currently do all routing on FR4 material tyically on a
1/4" high stack of panels
(4 X 0.062") with a soft tooling plate backing.
Please forward all messages to the attention of A. McKean.
Regards
Andy McKean
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
