ok, I really AM in a fog today.... I just didn't look far enough

THANK YOU!

"waiter, more coffee, please!"

Jack

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:17 AM, John Perry <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Jack,
>
> I believe the words you are looking for in IPC-6012C are in section 3.1,
> General.  Here is the reference to meeting the generic requirements of
> IPC-6011.  So in the case of this document, the wording is a little farther
> in than the other documents, which has such language in section 1.
>
> John Perry
> Technical Project Manager
> IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries(r)
> 3000 Lakeside Drive # 309S
> Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA
> +1 847-597-2818 (tel)
> +1 847-615-7105 (fax)
> +1 847-615-7100 (Main)
> [log in to unmask]
> www.ipc.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:13 AM
> To: Listserv IPC-600-6012
> Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Document Sets
>
> I have a question about how document sets are structured, in particular
> comparing the 6010 series with others like 2220 or 2610 series.
>
> IPC-2222 specifically incorporates all of the generic IPC-2221 with this
> statement:
>
> 1.1 Purpose The requirements contained herein are intended to establish
> specific design details that shall be used in conjunction with IPC-2221
>
> IPC-2614 (for example) incorporates everything in the generic IPC-2611
>
> 3 REQUIREMENTS The requirements of IPC-2611 are a mandatory part of this
> standard.
>
> What this says to me is that the documentation only needs to call out the
> specific standard to get the requirements of BOTH the specific and the
> genericl standards.
>
> Logically I assume that the same holds true for IPC-6011 and IPC-6012, but
> in my latest copy of 6012C (PROPOSED STANDARD FOR BALLOT - JANUARY 2010) I
> don't see any wording like this. Am I losing my mind? Do I have to call out
> BOTH of them on my fabrication drawing?
>
> onward thru the fog,
> Jack
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________