ok, I really AM in a fog today.... I just didn't look far enough THANK YOU! "waiter, more coffee, please!" Jack On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:17 AM, John Perry <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > I believe the words you are looking for in IPC-6012C are in section 3.1, > General. Here is the reference to meeting the generic requirements of > IPC-6011. So in the case of this document, the wording is a little farther > in than the other documents, which has such language in section 1. > > John Perry > Technical Project Manager > IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries(r) > 3000 Lakeside Drive # 309S > Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA > +1 847-597-2818 (tel) > +1 847-615-7105 (fax) > +1 847-615-7100 (Main) > [log in to unmask] > www.ipc.org > > -----Original Message----- > From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:13 AM > To: Listserv IPC-600-6012 > Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Document Sets > > I have a question about how document sets are structured, in particular > comparing the 6010 series with others like 2220 or 2610 series. > > IPC-2222 specifically incorporates all of the generic IPC-2221 with this > statement: > > 1.1 Purpose The requirements contained herein are intended to establish > specific design details that shall be used in conjunction with IPC-2221 > > IPC-2614 (for example) incorporates everything in the generic IPC-2611 > > 3 REQUIREMENTS The requirements of IPC-2611 are a mandatory part of this > standard. > > What this says to me is that the documentation only needs to call out the > specific standard to get the requirements of BOTH the specific and the > genericl standards. > > Logically I assume that the same holds true for IPC-6011 and IPC-6012, but > in my latest copy of 6012C (PROPOSED STANDARD FOR BALLOT - JANUARY 2010) I > don't see any wording like this. Am I losing my mind? Do I have to call out > BOTH of them on my fabrication drawing? > > onward thru the fog, > Jack > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] > ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________