IPC-600-6012 Archives

August 2006

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C6B742.0D526890"
Sender:
IPC-600-6012<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Inspection of Solder Resist
From:
"Knapp, Clarence W." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:16:13 -0700
MIME-Version:
1.0
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Reply-To:
"(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (414 bytes) , DSCN2423.JPG (1 MB) 
I just run into a problem between IPC-A-600 and IPC-A-610. In the IPC
600 Solder Resist cracking is not addressed with the waves and wrinkles
so it is not inspected for and generally ignored. However, IPC-A-610
states that crack of the resist is a rejection. The enclosed picture is
an example of the crack on bare board.
 <<DSCN2423.JPG>> 

Clarence W Knapp 
M&P Engineering
Ph 818 715 2478
Fx 818 719 7769
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2