Here are links to analyses in three periodicals of the Stern report on
global warming. As you might guess, they disparage it.

http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/20061104-103214-4305r.htm 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15563663/site/newsweek/ 

http://www.thebusinessonline.com/Document.aspx?id=83497085-CFCF-4763-AF8
1-687746BE6F0A Here's an excerpt from this last link:

In Washington, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) said the Stern
review would have no traction internationally as its economic mistakes
would be instantly recognised by experts in the field. "Stern's costs
are actually more expensive than doing nothing about climate change
itself," said Iain Murray, senior fellow at CEI specialising in climate
change. "This is 'Chicken Little' stuff," said Murray, "except Chicken
Little wasn't trying to scare the public in order to create Enron-style
con games and line the pockets of Wall Street bankers at the expense of
consumers."

Gordon Davy