Here are links to analyses in three periodicals of the Stern report on global warming. As you might guess, they disparage it. http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/20061104-103214-4305r.htm http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15563663/site/newsweek/ http://www.thebusinessonline.com/Document.aspx?id=83497085-CFCF-4763-AF8 1-687746BE6F0A Here's an excerpt from this last link: In Washington, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) said the Stern review would have no traction internationally as its economic mistakes would be instantly recognised by experts in the field. "Stern's costs are actually more expensive than doing nothing about climate change itself," said Iain Murray, senior fellow at CEI specialising in climate change. "This is 'Chicken Little' stuff," said Murray, "except Chicken Little wasn't trying to scare the public in order to create Enron-style con games and line the pockets of Wall Street bankers at the expense of consumers." Gordon Davy