EMBEDDEDNET Archives

April 2006

EmbeddedNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
EmbeddedNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
D-50 Embedded Devices Committee Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:27:15 -0700
Reply-To:
D-50 Embedded Devices Committee Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Daniel Brandler <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: "Inserted" embedded components - slides for today's discussion
From:
Daniel Brandler <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
Dennis,

Thanks for the info. I don't think that the technology for inserting
components into PCBs is a "threat" to embedded passives. The designs
look like a very expensive constructions. Except for "inserting  known
good dies," I doubt that sequentially built PCBs with "cutouts" will be
cost competitive with conventional multilayer PCBs and embedded passive
components. Furthermore, a 1005 size limit (0402 to us) is not small
enough. They will have to do better than that.

Best regards,

Daniel Brandler
Ohmega Technologies, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2