DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

March 2016

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"Anderson, Veronika" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:37:23 -0500
Reply-To:
"(Designers Council Forum)" <[log in to unmask]>, Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
Designers Council Forum <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (116 lines)
Thanks for taking the time to respond.

I don't think you can use the Saturn ToolKit or any other Trace Width
calculator to estimate spoke widths, because the formulas are determining a
relationship between the current, the copper cross-sectional area, and the
corresponding heat rise. These calculators make an adjustment for the heat
sinking ability of a NEARBY plane. What you have in a thermal spoke is an
extremely short trace DIRECTLY CONNECTED to a heat-sinking plane, which
changes everything (at least it is not accounted for in the calculators)

For an example, I might have a plane that is an inch wide (3oz) carrying
45A, (which fits the Saturn calculator results), but the thermal spokes
connecting the pin to that plane do not need to be an inch wide, do they?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Anderson, Veronika <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The percentage of hole fill with solder depends on Class (1,2,3) of the
> final product.
> Refer to IPC-J-STD-001, Paragraph 6.2.2 and Table 6-4.
> Based on your number 75% I assume that you are building Class 3 product
> and your vendor does not have AOI equipment.
> Therefore, they cannot verify the percentage of fill. That is why they
> want to have the solder to be visible from the other side.
>
> You will find the Thermal Relief spoke calculations in IPC -2222, 9.1.2.
> However, as stated at the end of the paragraph, "calculated spoke width
> shall not violate current carrying capacity requirements". Personally, I
> never fill comfortable with the calculated number for high current traces.
> I always increase it.
> I recommend to use Saturn PCB Toolkit (free from Saturn PCB Design, Inc.)
> and increase the number based on the copper thickness, current and your
> gut's feelings.
>
> Regards,
>
> Veronika Anderson C.I.D | Sr. Electrical/Mechanical Design Engineer |
> Excelitas Technologies
>
> My old phone number +1 626.967.9521 x 236 no longer works.
>
> Office:  +1 626-593-6025.
> 1330 East Cypress Street, Covina, CA 91724 USA
> [log in to unmask]
> www.excelitas.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack
> Olson
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 12:30 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [DC] Hole Fill and Thermal Relief
>
> I posted this to IPC TechNet, but I think many people are busy at APEX this
> week:
>
> -=-=-=-
>
> Maybe I should know better than to ask two questions in the same email,
> but they're related...
> I got into a discussion about the hole fill requirement for some large
> through-hole power devices and connectors. The supplier is worried about
> using a "percentage" hole fill measurement, because he says that even if
> the hole is 75% full (or whatever percentage we want to use) the hole wall
> will not be WETTED 75%. He maintains that the cold solder can extend up
> farther than the actual portion that makes a good joint. So he is looking
> at the TOP PAD WETTING for verification of a good solder joint, even though
> we don't require it.
>
> Q1) It seems like an inspection procedure looking for WETTING instead of
> HOLE FILL is not what is intended in IPC, but does he have a point? The
> hole fill problem is with Selective Soldering, not Reflow
>
> Q2) Wanting to provide bare board designs using good DFM practices, I
> would be willing to reduce my thermal spoke widths so the solder will flow
> better, but I can't find a calculation that would tell me what I need for
> something like 10A. There is nothing about this in the IPC-2152 Current
> Carrying standard. Is there a rough guideline I can use for current through
> planes using thermal relief??
>
> thanks,
> Jack
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 16.0.
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
> To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
> DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL) For additional information, or contact Keach
> Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0.
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2