DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vGUxi-0000QiC; Thu, 24 Oct 96 13:57 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Oct 1996 12:50:57 -0700
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
[log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Mon Oct 28 08:
46:23 1996
Resent-Sender:
DesignerCouncil-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2179
TO:
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Return-Path:
<DesignerCouncil-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"B8mF5.0.7RL.ylxRo"@ipc>
Subject:
Surface Mount Land Patterns -Reply
From:
[log in to unmask]
X-Loop:
[log in to unmask]
X-Mailer:
WordPerfect Office 4.0
Message-Id:
<[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
My experience using IPC-782 is all good, no
bad or ugly.
My understanding is that these foot prints
are evolved thru actual trial and error.
This is also the argument I use if our
factory questions the foot prints.
(which is rare)
I would still be interested to see what
others have to say, though.
Gary Bauder
Amtech Systems
Albuquerque, NM
[log in to unmask]


****************************************************************************
* The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05      *
**************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:            *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
****************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2