DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

June 1999

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mitch Morey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:21:22 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (925 bytes) , text/html (1025 bytes)
Doug wrote:

> Would someone please be kind enough to explain what
> design criteria would require holes in SMD pads?
>
> Especially blind holes in SMD pads?
>

 Hi Doug,

That's not a bad question, if you haven't done an "impossible" double-sided (active devices, both sides),
way-too-much stuff on the board design. The design criteria might be:

1) Very high density, surface mount board, with lots of busses and lots of critical matched pairs, and
matched groups.

2) A blind via board is very adaptable to putting the vias in the pads. These vias tend to be very small,
.004-.010"; and only go .004-008" into the board. There goes the 'ol solderpaste into the via, my
components don't get good solder joint complaints.

3) High pin count BGAs and QFPs can be prime candidates for via in pad designs.

As always, check with your fab house(s) and assembly people before proceeding down that path though.

Good luck,

Mitch
Sr PCB Designer
San Diego, CA


ATOM RSS1 RSS2