DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1996

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0u1voK-00007SC; Wed, 27 Mar 96 08:02 CST
From [log in to unmask] Thu Mar 28 09:
53:55 1996
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 27 Mar 1996 08:59:50 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3151
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"TWjCN3.0.U23.9gKMn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
X-Sun-Charset:
US-ASCII
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)

John--
    On all of our assembly drawings that contain thru-hole component leads, 
 we reference the lead protrusion allowed as a max dimension and allow
 "the absence of component lead contour discernibilty in the solder joint
 is permissible."(Quote from our drawings). On any design with a total 
 thickness (pwb + heatsink) above .130, it will contain the note for lead
 penetration ""WITOUT PROTRUSION". Since we do only mil work, a WHITE
 PAPER was prepared for customer/military approval. We beleive that it is 
 not a reliability issue based on testing completed in-house. We have many 
 systems flying without negitive feedback for several years and are very
 comfortable with our decision. Feel free to contact me if you have any
 questions. Have a good day.

  (203) 852-4810                                       Bob Vanech



ATOM RSS1 RSS2