DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

September 1997

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
speedy turtle <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Sep 1997 18:56:45 -0400
Reply-To:
"DesignerCouncil Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Doug McKean <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: current vs trace width graphs
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Doug McKean <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
> From: speedy turtle <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [DESIGNERCOUNCIL] current vs trace width graphs
> Date: Wednesday, September 03, 1997 2:02 PM
>
> I am looking for the formulas to generate the graphs
> that represent "Current in amperes" vs "Cross section in
> square mils" and any others of similar type.
>
> Does anyone know where I can obtain these formulas ?

Well, if Ralph was still here,
I'm sure he'd tell you they were from empirical data,
exactly when the testing was performed,
and exactly who performed the test.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2