DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

April 2001

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:41:38 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
As our designs get denser, we're using smaller and smaller vias
(.015 pad, .008 +.000/-.008 FHS in some cases) to gain more space;
yet it's still not enough. We're having to add additional layers
just to route some of the fine pitch BGA's.
We're trying to avoid blind/buried vias to keep costs down, but
is anyone out there using via-in-pad technology? On BGA's or
on everything? What size via are you using? Are you seeing any
cost increase (in fab/assembly/test processes)? If so, what
percentage increase can I expect? Thanks in advance for any info
you can provide.

********************
Alexis Meehan
PCB CAD Mgr.
408-328-4595
[log in to unmask]
570 Maude Court
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
http://www.luxn.com
LuxN - The Optical Renaissance has begun!(tm)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2