TECHNET Archives

August 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Bealer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Bealer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:31:36 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Has anyone been able to run a passing Gauge R&R on a device like the Defelsko Positector?



David Bealer

Sr. Process Engineer

office 800-637-2645 x6022   cell 217-474-8760



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of lduso - Diamond-MT.com

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 7:22 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Conformal coat wet to dry evaporation



[External Sender]



Andy



Graham is correct. HDBK-830 is the better choice. It is a guide to help people understand everything about the coating application. It even includes a section on measuring, 8.11.1. The CC-830 is a material qualification spec only. It is the spec outlining all the testing requirements of conformal coatings. It is what the coating manufacturers follow to qualify their products. Actually, the handbook does a great job of explaining the relationship of the different IPC specs in sections 2.15 & 2.16.



We are like Jeff. We measure with coupons for thickness verification after the coating is dry to the touch. You can use a micrometer or as many do, a device like the Defelsko Positector.



Lloyd Duso

Diamond-MT

(814) 535-3505

www.Diamond-mt.com





On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 7:49 AM Andrew Hoey <[log in to unmask]>

wrote:



> Hi Graham,

>

> Thanks for the help,

>

> We overlooked micrometers to be honest!

>

> I have a copy of the HDBK-830, is the CC-830 more suitable?

>

> We conformal coat a variety of boards due to customer requirements -

> most of them are flying or going underwater.

> We've been conformally coating for about 6 years now but it recently

> got picked up by an auditor that our verification methods were not

> adequate, hence our attempts to put proper controls in place before

> those pesky auditors return!

>

> Thanks,

>

> Andy

>

This e-mail message, including any attachments and previous email messages sent with it, contains CONFIDENTIAL and PROPRIETARY information of Watchfire Signs, LLC or its subsidiaries and may be legally PRIVILEGED. You may not use, disclose, reproduce or distribute such information without Watchfire’s authorization. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message, its attachments and any copies thereof.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2