Ja.. , ja... , I think also. But there is really a problem with a missed
year 0, as I can remember (to a paper, not to year 0). May be the chronicles
addresses a squence of years as follows:  -.., -2, -1, +1, +2, +..,  et
cetera, but no "0"
Bernhard
"uno anno prior millenium nova" - oder so ähnlich!

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:  Kinol, Vince [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Gesendet am:  Dienstag, 21. Dezember 1999 18:58
> An:   [log in to unmask]
> Betreff:      [TN] AD
>
> Just a quick Latin lesson "AD" anno Domini "in the year of the lord"
> started
> at birth. Or so I am told.
> VBK
> Vincent B. Kinol CQE

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################