Ingemar, I read your postings and after careful decryption, I can somewhat decipher what your point is. Other than that, you confuse the dingly-dangly-ping-pong out of me. Cheers. Jason Gregory Process Tech Tadiran Microwave Networks > -----Original Message----- > From: Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 8:14 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [TN] Clogging dispensers soon... > > Aussilek's mail is decoded and commented as follows: > > From Ayer's Rock: > > a) > hindrance, correct, but NOT in outlet of needle (drips, remember?); the > inlet more likely : RE: I reverse, y'rright. > aa) > flakes being clumsy solids in fluids will be manipulated by inconsiderate > internals (angles, reductions, etc); RE: seen it with own eye(s) > aaa) > on top of standard wall drag .RE: mud on riversides, yes, got it. > aaaa) > overpressure, correct again with the low viscosity (considering your > minimal > pressure reported).RE: N/A > aaaa) > I always stated piston (linear) would beat auger in this application. > One of other dispensers (air all the way) for silicones we have here takes > off the pressure (sudden = gulp back)on the end of cycle ; whereas the > gulp > back sucks back the running inertia ; than keeps level with 0psi . > Even the position and stage of emptiness of cartridge (vertical, > horizontal, > below or above dispensing point, full or quarter full only, etc.) was > rather > critical in the long (repeatability) run on this low viscosity's (drips). > Unless designed that way (642 auger is not); without positive shut of > valve(paste) or at least air release (non complicated in low psi's ; as it > can not gulp the cartridge piston back) ; you have very little chance of > repeatability condition. RE: GULP! > aaaaa) > Sound some poor soul over there did not validate the application and still > tries to put square peg to round hole . Hope it's not you . RE: No, was > SirMurphy > aaaaaa) > The auger will spiral the CONSTANT pressure if you stop > on low viscosity > drips . RE: Will ask PMJ what they say about it. > > b > no it won't be a problem as such (with consistent suspended particles), > the > mass and it's composition stays more or less same ; however the smeared > agglomerations from auger will plug you up (right there). RE: There! My... > c > hmm ; bad idea pumpkin : RE: said also wine brewer in England > c1 > precision cut needed ; take burr of inside ; put chamfer back on the > outside > (essential for release),RE: how much, angles? > ok you can do it ; I know ; still: > c2 > you alter (if not remove) the streamlining factor for the flow ; > and get the "impression" of auger onto the dot; > seen even a crawl-up back on outside of the needle with very short > orifices > (pending viscosity)! RE: 100,000cps we have, havn't learned crawl yet, > best on back-stroke swim. > > c3 > 2mm or 10mm ; the blockage would occur on inlet ; not down the pipe . > RE: see now > From flakes view ; once (if) in, that length would have actually more > streamlining effect : RE: +or-? > paralleling the flakes due to side drag = no issue there . RE: same > c4 > the cutest one on the end : what do you 'think' prevents you from worst > still dripping presently ? > Drag on the needle walls ! The length is actually very much stabilizing > factor : RE: shame on you! Killing my 2mm idea! > Empirical test : head to your kitchen ; take 2 funnels ' chop one short ; > stand 'm on bottles ; > 2 honey jars in two (2)hands ; even pour , and watch thereafter . > if you mix few comparatively sifted flakes in (no bubbles please) ; > it will open your (2) eyes (green?)in no time . RE: as I said yesterday > > see yo' > paul > > PS > Cleaning ; pressurized water (grease pump should do you): put needle back > on > cartridge; plug side tube; > connect water ; and press the hydraulics button . > Laser cuts into metal, and how would you feel to be sandblasted ?!? > Perhaps a considerate winding (yes, you've guessed it, your sewing machine > spool winder) cotton thread inside polish would do ? RE: reading offset > smoke signals from your wife's working shop. > > PPS > Sorry, it's niet, pumpkin ; wrong theory ; rapid efforts in this direction > are getting you fast nowhere . RE: this is not Alice Springs.. > > Now ; lets see if your alleged Cyclops come home with bacon . > I'd consider an apology to the bright stereoscopic (at least, discounting > Shiva disciples) lodge here, pumpkin . RE: My fishes EAT cyclops, don't do > much conversation with them.... > > CU > > Ingemar > > ############################################################## > TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c > ############################################################## > To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with > following text in > the body: > To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name> > To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET > ############################################################## > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for > additional > information. > If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or > 847-509-9700 ext.5365 > ############################################################## ############################################################## TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c ############################################################## To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body: To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TECHNET ############################################################## Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information. If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5365 ##############################################################