Following from the EMPF HelpLine in Indianapolis, prepared by Jim Moffitt: To my knowledge no one has done such a comparison. The different philosophies of the two documents would make that sort of an apples and oranges comparison. In a general sense the accept/reject criteria of A-610 can be applied to the defect table of Mil-Std, however it should be born in mind that the firm (enforceable) criteria of each is (by the definitions IN each document) contained by the verbage (text) and that line drawings, photographs and illustrations are for the purposes of clarification or information only. Since the two documents frequently use a different set of words to describe the same attribute, there is no direct correlation between the criteria, although in some cases they use the same illustrations. Clear as mud?? >>Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 09:04:04 +0000 >>Subject: ASM: 610B / 2000A Comparison >>Resent-From: [log in to unmask] >> >>Has anyone performed a detailed comparison analysis or a cross >>reference matrix between the acceptance criteria of IPC-A-610B >>and MIL-STD-2000A? >> >>Thanks, >>Dan >> >>The mail list is provided by IPC using SmartList v3.05 >>To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: >>[log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. >> > Jack Crawford HelpLine Manager Electronics Mfg. Productivity Facility 317.226.5616 Visit our homepage at: http://www.empf.org *************************************************************************** * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * *************************************************************************** * To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: * * [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. * ***************************************************************************