Sorry, you touched a nerve. Judging quality by what you can produce is counter to what you should be trying to accomplish. Quality should be judged by the customers (internal and external), their requirements and expectations. If your quality system is nit-picking attributes that don't matter to all your customers, then controlling those attributes is a waste of time and money. If you were controlling certain attributes before and can't meet those same requirements with the new process, then you are either saying the attributes never really mattered or the customers' requirements and expectations don't matter. ---------- From: TechNet-request To: technet Subject: CA Picard Exposure Frames Date: Monday, September 16, 1996 6:16PM We have just recently implemented the Picard Exposure Frames. This system has been performing very well registration and exposure wise, however; our quality system for first piece inspection has opened some production concerns. Could anyone tell me what quality systems they are using and what system was found that did not hurt their production. *************************************************************************** * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * *************************************************************************** * To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: * * [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. * *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** * TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * *************************************************************************** * To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: * * [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. * ***************************************************************************