Hi Reuven - the purpose for the destructive test is not a short cut around a full monitoring/reporting system, I have a different purpose for needing the assessment. Dave On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi David, > Shortcut is not the right way to monitor the REACH-SVHC 181 substances. > You should data collect from each parts / Mfrs the SVHC details and FMD > data. > > נשלח מה-iPhone של ראובן רוקח > > ב-11 ביוני 2018, בשעה 17:00, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]> > כתב/ה: > > > Dave, > > I would start with > > www.claigan.com/contact/ > > Claigan Environmental Inc. 4043 Carling Avenue, Suite 120. Kanata, ON > K2K 2A4 Canada. Phone: +1 (613) 599-4444. Sales: +1 (613) 853-5271 > > > > However, REACH testing can be VERY expensive. You need to focus on the > chemicals that are the most likely to be present. The most likely culprits > are phthalates. > > > > Regards, > > Bev > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of David Hillman > > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:48 AM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: [TN] REACH Compliance > > > > Hi team! Hey, I am looking for laboratories who can take a printed > circuit assembly and conduct a destructive REACH compliance assessment. > Please shoot me an off line email with any suggested resources you would > recommend. > > > > TIA > > > > Dave Hillman > > Rockwell Collins > > [log in to unmask] >