Thayer, Thank you very much. Will remain on the line.... rgds,Ricardo >>> Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]> 27/01/2015 11:55 >>> Apologies, Ricardo. I don't think anyone has the experience you are asking for the results of. In that frequency range, I believe the Nickel will overwhelm the Gold and Palladium, just because of the thickness difference and the skin depth will still extend past the Nickel. Since the Nickel thickness is the same for those two finish options, I expect the same results. But that is opinion, not test data, and I didn't even run the skin depth calculation, which is readily available. Wayne Thayer -----Original Message----- From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ricardo Moncaglieri Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 7:42 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: [TN] ENEPIG on Space RF (1-2GHz) Applications ----- RESENT ----- Dear Colleagues, We are facing a space RF Radar application. In the past we have had experience on RF RADAR freq. applications using TMM10 ROGERS IAu etc. We have no experience using ENEPIG on space Radar (1-2GHz) applications. We have been looking some papers refering to ENIG but not ENEPIG. Will appreciate so far any of you can submit some data on this subject better if as per own experience can ensure ENEPIG doesnt affect negativelly RF pcb performance, loss, impedance etc Keep awaiting your unvaluable feedback. brgds,Ricardo ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________