Sort of, but implies that it is undesirable or a defect. What I am looking for is a term that says it looks different, but not necessarily bad or actionable. Doug Pauls From: Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> Date: 01/06/2014 04:18 PM Subject: RE: [TN] Help with a Term Blemish? Ed Popielarski Engineering Manager 970 NE 21st Ct. Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277 Ph: 360-675-1322 Fx: 206-624-0695 Cl: 949-581-6601 https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A -----Original Message----- From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 2:10 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: [TN] Help with a Term Good afternoon all, I need help finding an adequate term for something, so I thought I would ask you all. If I am inspecting conformal coating, and I see a visual "item of interest", what term generically do I call the "item of interest"? The item of interest may or may not be a defect but it looks visually different than the coating around it. I have tried Visual Anomaly, or Visual Artifact, but people here don't seem to like any of them? What do y'all think? Doug Pauls ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________