I'm sorry for that. Must have missed something in the usage of LinkedIn. Anyway, I think I don't have much to offer for giant NASA. Rather the opposite, you have a lot, but that is available for anyone of the Technetters without me. /Inge PS. There MIGHT be something: I plan to make a 2 minute DVD from my thousands of SEM and LOM photos. Tell Jay Brusse that. On 1 February 2013 16:49, Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[ARES CORP] < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > I also got an invite from Inge. I just went ahead and accepted it. > > Rigo > > Sr. Quality Engineer > NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center > Workmanship Standards, Code 300 > Phone. (301) 286-6129 > Fax. (301) 286-6576 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Wolfe > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:37 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [TN] LinkedIn Inflation > > So far I have only seen endorsements from people I actually know & have > actually worked with. > However, I have received multiples from a few people which has me > wondering what is up with that? > I have not used my contact list with LI either. > However with respect to Inge on this forum I had received an invite twice > now from him supposedly from LI, however it was to my work email and not > the email I have set up with LI. > So I did not respond to those and sent him an invite myself directly from > LI with a note that if it had not been him that really sent invite just > discard this one. So if Inge did not originally send an invite then I would > also agree either someone imported addresses or something else is going on. > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:18 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [TN] LinkedIn Inflation > > What I have noticed is many people "endorsing" me for skills. > Why would anyone bother to do that? > Do they get something out of it? > How do they know what I am truly skilled at, anyway? > (I haven't worked with any of these people) Has anyone else noticed this? > > Jack > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Kimchuk > Inc. and is solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this > e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipients or > otherwise have reason to be believe that you have received this message in > error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from > your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, > printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________