还有一个重要的因素,元件脚大小和孔径的匹配性。如果超过0.2mm,引起焊接锡洞的风险也大大升高。個人非常不贊同你的觀點,因為你的這個結論是錯誤的。


Best Regards
寄件者: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 代理 维乐他爸
寄件日期: 2012年6月7日 10:23
收件者: [log in to unmask]
主旨: [TGAsia] 回复:[TGAsia] 答复: Re: [TGAsia] 答复: [TGAs ia] 请教,焊锡引脚上有空洞的原因及判定基准


还有一个重要的因素,元件脚大小和孔径的匹配性。如果超过0.2mm,引起焊接锡洞的风险也大大升高。

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Bohao Zhou"<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>;
发送时间: 2012年6月7日(星期四) 上午9:48
收件人: "TGAsia"<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>;
主题: [TGAsia] 答复: Re: [TGAsia] 答复: [TGAs ia] 请教,焊锡引脚上有空洞的原因及判定基准

*****************************************************
太仓阿尔派电子有限公司
生产技术课:周博浩
地址:江苏太仓经济开发区广州西路1号
TEL:0512-53568111-6421
FAX:0512-53568112
E-Mail:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>



  发件人:     BOHAO ZHOU/AOTA/SPEED

  收件人:     <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

  抄送:       [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

  日期:       2012-06-07 09:44

  主题:       答复:  Re: [TGAsia] 答复: [TGAsia] 请教,焊锡引脚上有空洞的原因及判定基准





关于这个问题我们做了很多实验,减少和增大松香的量,增加预热的时间,提高焊接温度
和时间,但是效果都不是很明显,
也尝试过基板预烘干(这个有点效果,但不能彻底解决问题),想请问一下基板预烘干的
温度和时间一般设定为多少度烘干多长时间呢?
基板断面分析\X-RAY 也作过,但是还是没有找到真正的原因.
想请问还可以从哪些方面分析找原因呢?




  发件人:     <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

  收件人:     <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

  日期:       2012-06-07 09:05

  主题:       Re: [TGAsia] 答复: [TGAsia] 请教,焊锡引脚上有空洞的原因及判定基准

  发件人:    TGAsia <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>







这种情况还有一种可能,波峰焊在焊接前需要喷涂flux,flux受热时会发生分解产生
气体,要是喷涂的量过大或是flux的活性过强,产生的气体来不及排除,就有可能在
焊点中产生针孔

Thanks and Best Regards

Sonic Lu 陆尚

宠辱不惊,闲看庭前花开花落
去留无意,漫随天外云卷云舒
Autoliv Electronics China (ACE) Co.,Ltd
Tel:  +86-21-67109300-3162


 "Yun, Xunisa (惲黎銀 IES)"
 <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
 Sent by: TGAsia <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>                                       To
                                              <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
                                                                        cc
 2012-06-06 20:07
                                                                   Subject
                                              [TGAsia] 答复: [TGAsia] 请
           Please respond to                  教,焊锡引脚上有空洞的原因及
      "Yun, Xunisa (惲黎銀 IES)"              判定基准
     <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>











我们称之为吹孔,通常是由于PCB 孔壁镀铜异常造成基材膨胀产生的气体外泄所
致,以我们的经验责任判定都是属PCB供应商的,可追偿。
通常需要切片进一步分析才能得到真正原因。



Best Regards
Xunisa, Yun
EXT: 63184,MVPN:663184
MPT/IPT – Inventec Group
发件人: TGAsia [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<mailto:[mailto:[log in to unmask]]> 代表 Bohao Zhou
发送时间: 2012年6月6日 10:10
收件人: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
主题: [TGAsia] 请教,焊锡引脚上有空洞的原因及判定基准


请教各位专家一个问题:
基板在过完波峰焊以后,焊锡引脚上会发生空洞.
附照片:
(Embedded image moved to file: pic17035.gif)
请问产生空洞的原因会有哪些呢?另外IPC中有没有关于这方面的判定基准呢?

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
______________________________________________________________________



 ***************************************************************
 Consider the environment before printing this message.

 To read Autoliv's Information and Confidentiality Notice, follow this link:
 http://www.autoliv.com/disclaimer.html
 ***************************************************************




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________