Having Graham respond was expected. Hearing that there was a current charge to a card, he was worried it was his AMEX. Having you respond was tantamount to EMI. Having Doug respond would be Tres Amigos and I would be concerned we refried the circuit. Dewey ________________________________ From: Inge Hernefjord [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:12 AM To: Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) Cc: TechNet E-Mail Forum; [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: NTC A leakage told me that you did currently charge your pun store so hard that it it became shorted and nulled for a long time. /Inge On 11 May 2012 17:41, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Since Inge and Doug pinged me; this is Friday; and there is always an element of truth in what I say: I thought I would pass this along to show you do not suffer alone. We had a non-procurable part (ceramic resistor network) and I had rejected the alternate. After several meetings concerning placement, testing, signal integrity and the like we came to a plan I promptly told the team "Thankfully, our resistance to change did not impede our capacitance for success. Dewey ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________